NAME¶
Test - provides a simple framework for writing test scripts
SYNOPSIS¶
use strict;
use Test;
# use a BEGIN block so we print our plan before MyModule is loaded
BEGIN { plan tests => 14, todo => [3,4] }
# load your module...
use MyModule;
# Helpful notes. All note-lines must start with a "#".
print "# I'm testing MyModule version $MyModule::VERSION\n";
ok(0); # failure
ok(1); # success
ok(0); # ok, expected failure (see todo list, above)
ok(1); # surprise success!
ok(0,1); # failure: '0' ne '1'
ok('broke','fixed'); # failure: 'broke' ne 'fixed'
ok('fixed','fixed'); # success: 'fixed' eq 'fixed'
ok('fixed',qr/x/); # success: 'fixed' =~ qr/x/
ok(sub { 1+1 }, 2); # success: '2' eq '2'
ok(sub { 1+1 }, 3); # failure: '2' ne '3'
my @list = (0,0);
ok @list, 3, "\@list=".join(',',@list); #extra notes
ok 'segmentation fault', '/(?i)success/'; #regex match
skip(
$^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? "Skip if MSWin" : 0, # whether to skip
$foo, $bar # arguments just like for ok(...)
);
skip(
$^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? 0 : "Skip unless MSWin", # whether to skip
$foo, $bar # arguments just like for ok(...)
);
DESCRIPTION¶
This module simplifies the task of writing test files for Perl modules, such
that their output is in the format that Test::Harness expects to see.
QUICK START GUIDE¶
To write a test for your new (and probably not even done) module, create a new
file called
t/test.t (in a new
t directory). If you have
multiple test files, to test the "foo", "bar", and
"baz" feature sets, then feel free to call your files
t/foo.t,
t/bar.t, and
t/baz.t
Functions¶
This module defines three public functions, "plan(...)",
"ok(...)", and "skip(...)". By default, all three are
exported by the "use Test;" statement.
- "plan(...)"
-
BEGIN { plan %theplan; }
This should be the first thing you call in your test script. It declares
your testing plan, how many there will be, if any of them should be
allowed to fail, and so on.
Typical usage is just:
use Test;
BEGIN { plan tests => 23 }
These are the things that you can put in the parameters to plan:
- "tests => number"
- The number of tests in your script. This means all ok() and
skip() calls.
- "todo => [1,5,14]"
- A reference to a list of tests which are allowed to fail. See "TODO
TESTS".
- "onfail => sub { ... }"
- "onfail => \&some_sub"
- A subroutine reference to be run at the end of the test script, if any of
the tests fail. See "ONFAIL".
You must call "plan(...)" once and only once. You should call it in a
"BEGIN {...}" block, like so:
BEGIN { plan tests => 23 }
- "ok(...)"
-
ok(1 + 1 == 2);
ok($have, $expect);
ok($have, $expect, $diagnostics);
This function is the reason for "Test"'s existence. It's the basic
function that handles printing ""ok"" or
""not ok"", along with the current test number.
(That's what "Test::Harness" wants to see.)
In its most basic usage, "ok(...)" simply takes a single scalar
expression. If its value is true, the test passes; if false, the test
fails. Examples:
# Examples of ok(scalar)
ok( 1 + 1 == 2 ); # ok if 1 + 1 == 2
ok( $foo =~ /bar/ ); # ok if $foo contains 'bar'
ok( baz($x + $y) eq 'Armondo' ); # ok if baz($x + $y) returns
# 'Armondo'
ok( @a == @b ); # ok if @a and @b are the same length
The expression is evaluated in scalar context. So the following will work:
ok( @stuff ); # ok if @stuff has any elements
ok( !grep !defined $_, @stuff ); # ok if everything in @stuff is
# defined.
A special case is if the expression is a subroutine reference (in either
"sub {...}" syntax or "\&foo" syntax). In that
case, it is executed and its value (true or false) determines if the test
passes or fails. For example,
ok( sub { # See whether sleep works at least passably
my $start_time = time;
sleep 5;
time() - $start_time >= 4
});
In its two-argument form, "ok( arg1, arg2)" compares
the two scalar values to see if they match. They match if both are
undefined, or if arg2 is a regex that matches arg1, or if
they compare equal with "eq".
# Example of ok(scalar, scalar)
ok( "this", "that" ); # not ok, 'this' ne 'that'
ok( "", undef ); # not ok, "" is defined
The second argument is considered a regex if it is either a regex object or
a string that looks like a regex. Regex objects are constructed with the
qr// operator in recent versions of perl. A string is considered to look
like a regex if its first and last characters are "/", or if the
first character is "m" and its second and last characters are
both the same non-alphanumeric non-whitespace character. These regexp
Regex examples:
ok( 'JaffO', '/Jaff/' ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ /Jaff/
ok( 'JaffO', 'm|Jaff|' ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ m|Jaff|
ok( 'JaffO', qr/Jaff/ ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ qr/Jaff/;
ok( 'JaffO', '/(?i)jaff/ ); # ok, 'JaffO' =~ /jaff/i;
If either (or both!) is a subroutine reference, it is run and used as the
value for comparing. For example:
ok sub {
open(OUT, ">x.dat") || die $!;
print OUT "\x{e000}";
close OUT;
my $bytecount = -s 'x.dat';
unlink 'x.dat' or warn "Can't unlink : $!";
return $bytecount;
},
4
;
The above test passes two values to "ok(arg1, arg2)" -- the first
a coderef, and the second is the number 4. Before "ok" compares
them, it calls the coderef, and uses its return value as the real value of
this parameter. Assuming that $bytecount returns 4, "ok" ends up
testing "4 eq 4". Since that's true, this test passes.
Finally, you can append an optional third argument, in "ok(
arg1, arg2, note)", where note is a
string value that will be printed if the test fails. This should be some
useful information about the test, pertaining to why it failed, and/or a
description of the test. For example:
ok( grep($_ eq 'something unique', @stuff), 1,
"Something that should be unique isn't!\n".
'@stuff = '.join ', ', @stuff
);
Unfortunately, a note cannot be used with the single argument style of
"ok()". That is, if you try "ok( arg1,
note)", then "Test" will interpret this as "ok(
arg1, arg2)", and probably end up testing "
arg1 eq arg2" -- and that's not what you want!
All of the above special cases can occasionally cause some problems. See
"BUGS and CAVEATS".
- "skip(skip_if_true, args...)"
- This is used for tests that under some conditions can be skipped. It's
basically equivalent to:
if( $skip_if_true ) {
ok(1);
} else {
ok( args... );
}
...except that the ok(1) emits not just ""ok
testnum"" but actually ""ok testnum #
skip_if_true_value"".
The arguments after the skip_if_true are what is fed to
"ok(...)" if this test isn't skipped.
Example usage:
my $if_MSWin =
$^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? 'Skip if under MSWin' : '';
# A test to be skipped if under MSWin (i.e., run except under MSWin)
skip($if_MSWin, thing($foo), thing($bar) );
Or, going the other way:
my $unless_MSWin =
$^O =~ m/MSWin/ ? '' : 'Skip unless under MSWin';
# A test to be skipped unless under MSWin (i.e., run only under MSWin)
skip($unless_MSWin, thing($foo), thing($bar) );
The tricky thing to remember is that the first parameter is true if you want
to skip the test, not run it; and it also doubles as a note
about why it's being skipped. So in the first codeblock above, read the
code as "skip if MSWin -- (otherwise) test whether
"thing($foo)" is "thing($bar)"" or for the second
case, "skip unless MSWin...".
Also, when your skip_if_reason string is true, it really should (for
backwards compatibility with older Test.pm versions) start with the string
"Skip", as shown in the above examples.
Note that in the above cases, "thing($foo)" and
"thing($bar)" are evaluated -- but as long as the
"skip_if_true" is true, then we "skip(...)" just
tosses out their value (i.e., not bothering to treat them like values to
"ok(...)". But if you need to not eval the arguments when
skipping the test, use this format:
skip( $unless_MSWin,
sub {
# This code returns true if the test passes.
# (But it doesn't even get called if the test is skipped.)
thing($foo) eq thing($bar)
}
);
or even this, which is basically equivalent:
skip( $unless_MSWin,
sub { thing($foo) }, sub { thing($bar) }
);
That is, both are like this:
if( $unless_MSWin ) {
ok(1); # but it actually appends "# $unless_MSWin"
# so that Test::Harness can tell it's a skip
} else {
# Not skipping, so actually call and evaluate...
ok( sub { thing($foo) }, sub { thing($bar) } );
}
TEST TYPES¶
- •
- NORMAL TESTS
These tests are expected to succeed. Usually, most or all of your tests are
in this category. If a normal test doesn't succeed, then that means that
something is wrong.
- •
- SKIPPED TESTS
The "skip(...)" function is for tests that might or might not be
possible to run, depending on the availability of platform-specific
features. The first argument should evaluate to true (think "yes,
please skip") if the required feature is not available. After
the first argument, "skip(...)" works exactly the same way as
"ok(...)" does.
- •
- TODO TESTS
TODO tests are designed for maintaining an executable TODO list.
These tests are expected to fail. If a TODO test does succeed, then
the feature in question shouldn't be on the TODO list, now should it?
Packages should NOT be released with succeeding TODO tests. As soon as a
TODO test starts working, it should be promoted to a normal test, and the
newly working feature should be documented in the release notes or in the
change log.
ONFAIL¶
BEGIN { plan test => 4, onfail => sub { warn "CALL 911!" } }
Although test failures should be enough, extra diagnostics can be triggered at
the end of a test run. "onfail" is passed an array ref of hash refs
that describe each test failure. Each hash will contain at least the following
fields: "package", "repetition", and "result".
(You shouldn't rely on any other fields being present.) If the test had an
expected value or a diagnostic (or "note") string, these will also
be included.
The
optional "onfail" hook might be used simply to print out
the version of your package and/or how to report problems. It might also be
used to generate extremely sophisticated diagnostics for a particularly
bizarre test failure. However it's not a panacea. Core dumps or other
unrecoverable errors prevent the "onfail" hook from running. (It is
run inside an "END" block.) Besides, "onfail" is probably
over-kill in most cases. (Your test code should be simpler than the code it is
testing, yes?)
BUGS and CAVEATS¶
- •
- "ok(...)"'s special handing of strings which look like they
might be regexes can also cause unexpected behavior. An innocent:
ok( $fileglob, '/path/to/some/*stuff/' );
will fail, since Test.pm considers the second argument to be a regex! The
best bet is to use the one-argument form:
ok( $fileglob eq '/path/to/some/*stuff/' );
- •
- "ok(...)"'s use of string "eq" can sometimes cause odd
problems when comparing numbers, especially if you're casting a string to
a number:
$foo = "1.0";
ok( $foo, 1 ); # not ok, "1.0" ne 1
Your best bet is to use the single argument form:
ok( $foo == 1 ); # ok "1.0" == 1
- •
- As you may have inferred from the above documentation and examples,
"ok"'s prototype is "($;$$)" (and, incidentally,
"skip"'s is "($;$$$)"). This means, for example, that
you can do "ok @foo, @bar" to compare the size of the two
arrays. But don't be fooled into thinking that "ok @foo, @bar"
means a comparison of the contents of two arrays -- you're comparing
just the number of elements of each. It's so easy to make that
mistake in reading "ok @foo, @bar" that you might want to be
very explicit about it, and instead write "ok scalar(@foo),
scalar(@bar)".
- •
- This almost definitely doesn't do what you expect:
ok $thingy->can('some_method');
Why? Because "can" returns a coderef to mean "yes it can (and
the method is this...)", and then "ok" sees a coderef and
thinks you're passing a function that you want it to call and consider the
truth of the result of! I.e., just like:
ok $thingy->can('some_method')->();
What you probably want instead is this:
ok $thingy->can('some_method') && 1;
If the "can" returns false, then that is passed to "ok".
If it returns true, then the larger expression
"$thingy->can('some_method') && 1"
returns 1, which "ok" sees as a simple signal of success, as you
would expect.
- •
- The syntax for "skip" is about the only way it can be, but it's
still quite confusing. Just start with the above examples and you'll be
okay.
Moreover, users may expect this:
skip $unless_mswin, foo($bar), baz($quux);
to not evaluate "foo($bar)" and "baz($quux)" when the
test is being skipped. But in reality, they are evaluated, but
"skip" just won't bother comparing them if $unless_mswin is
true.
You could do this:
skip $unless_mswin, sub{foo($bar)}, sub{baz($quux)};
But that's not terribly pretty. You may find it simpler or clearer in the
long run to just do things like this:
if( $^O =~ m/MSWin/ ) {
print "# Yay, we're under $^O\n";
ok foo($bar), baz($quux);
ok thing($whatever), baz($stuff);
ok blorp($quux, $whatever);
ok foo($barzbarz), thang($quux);
} else {
print "# Feh, we're under $^O. Watch me skip some tests...\n";
for(1 .. 4) { skip "Skip unless under MSWin" }
}
But be quite sure that "ok" is called exactly as many times in the
first block as "skip" is called in the second block.
ENVIRONMENT¶
If "PERL_TEST_DIFF" environment variable is set, it will be used as a
command for comparing unexpected multiline results. If you have GNU diff
installed, you might want to set "PERL_TEST_DIFF" to "diff
-u". If you don't have a suitable program, you might install the
"Text::Diff" module and then set "PERL_TEST_DIFF" to be
"perl -MText::Diff -e 'print diff(@ARGV)'". If
"PERL_TEST_DIFF" isn't set but the "Algorithm::Diff"
module is available, then it will be used to show the differences in multiline
results.
NOTE¶
A past developer of this module once said that it was no longer being actively
developed. However, rumors of its demise were greatly exaggerated. Feedback
and suggestions are quite welcome.
Be aware that the main value of this module is its simplicity. Note that there
are already more ambitious modules out there, such as Test::More and
Test::Unit.
Some earlier versions of this module had docs with some confusing typos in the
description of "skip(...)".
SEE ALSO¶
Test::Harness
Test::Simple, Test::More, Devel::Cover
Test::Builder for building your own testing library.
Test::Unit is an interesting XUnit-style testing library.
Test::Inline and SelfTest let you embed tests in code.
AUTHOR¶
Copyright (c) 1998-2000 Joshua Nathaniel Pritikin.
Copyright (c) 2001-2002 Michael G. Schwern.
Copyright (c) 2002-2004 Sean M. Burke.
Current maintainer: Jesse Vincent. <jesse@bestpractical.com>
This package is free software and is provided "as is" without express
or implied warranty. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the
same terms as Perl itself.