## table of contents

- buster 5.28.1-6
- testing 5.30.0-10
- unstable 5.30.2-1
- experimental 5.30.1~rc1-1

integer(3perl) | Perl Programmers Reference Guide | integer(3perl) |

# NAME¶

integer - Perl pragma to use integer arithmetic instead of floating point# SYNOPSIS¶

use integer; $x = 10/3; # $x is now 3, not 3.33333333333333333

# DESCRIPTION¶

This tells the compiler to use integer operations from here to the end of the enclosing BLOCK. On many machines, this doesn't matter a great deal for most computations, but on those without floating point hardware, it can make a big difference in performance.Note that this only affects how most of the arithmetic and
relational **operators** handle their operands and results, and
**not** how all numbers everywhere are treated. Specifically,
"use integer;" has the effect that before
computing the results of the arithmetic operators (+, -, *, /, %, +=, -=,
*=, /=, %=, and unary minus), the comparison operators (<, <=, >,
>=, ==, !=, <=>), and the bitwise operators (|, &, ^, <<,
>>, |=, &=, ^=, <<=, >>=), the operands have their
fractional portions truncated (or floored), and the result will have its
fractional portion truncated as well. In addition, the range of operands and
results is restricted to that of familiar two's complement integers, i.e.,
-(2**31) .. (2**31-1) on 32-bit architectures, and -(2**63) .. (2**63-1) on
64-bit architectures. For example, this code

use integer; $x = 5.8; $y = 2.5; $z = 2.7; $a = 2**31 - 1; # Largest positive integer on 32-bit machines $, = ", "; print $x, -$x, $x+$y, $x-$y, $x/$y, $x*$y, $y==$z, $a, $a+1;

will print: 5.8, -5, 7, 3, 2, 10, 1, 2147483647, -2147483648

Note that $x is still printed as having
its true non-integer value of 5.8 since it wasn't operated on. And note too
the wrap-around from the largest positive integer to the largest negative
one. Also, arguments passed to functions and the values returned by them are
**not** affected by "use integer;".
E.g.,

srand(1.5); $, = ", "; print sin(.5), cos(.5), atan2(1,2), sqrt(2), rand(10);

will give the same result with or without "use integer;" The power operator "**" is also not affected, so that 2 ** .5 is always the square root of 2. Now, it so happens that the pre- and post- increment and decrement operators, ++ and --, are not affected by "use integer;" either. Some may rightly consider this to be a bug -- but at least it's a long-standing one.

Finally, "use integer;" also has
an additional affect on the bitwise operators. Normally, the operands and
results are treated as **unsigned** integers, but with
"use integer;" the operands and results
are **signed**. This means, among other things, that ~0 is -1, and -2
& -5 is -6.

Internally, native integer arithmetic (as provided by your C compiler) is used. This means that Perl's own semantics for arithmetic operations may not be preserved. One common source of trouble is the modulus of negative numbers, which Perl does one way, but your hardware may do another.

% perl -le 'print (4 % -3)' -2 % perl -Minteger -le 'print (4 % -3)' 1

See "Pragmatic Modules" in perlmodlib, "Integer Arithmetic" in perlop

2019-10-27 | perl v5.30.1 |