.TH MU-INDEX 1 "May 2020" "User Manuals" .SH NAME mu_index \- index e-mail messages stored in Maildirs .SH SYNOPSIS .B mu index [options] .SH DESCRIPTION \fBmu index\fR is the \fBmu\fR command for scanning the contents of Maildir directories and storing the results in a Xapian database. The data can then be queried using .BR mu-find (1)\. Note that before the first time you run \fBmu index\fR, you must run \fBmu init\fR to initialize the database. \fBindex\fR understands Maildirs as defined by Daniel Bernstein for \fBqmail\fR(7). In addition, it understands recursive Maildirs (Maildirs within Maildirs), Maildir++. It can also deal with VFAT-based Maildirs which use '!' or ';' as the separators instead of ':'. E-mail messages which are not stored in something resembling a maildir leaf-directory (\fIcur\fR and \fInew\fR) are ignored, as are the cache directories for \fInotmuch\fR and \fIgnus\fR, and any dot-directory. Starting with mu 1.5.x, symlinks are followed, and can be spread over multiple filesystems; however note that moving files around is much faster when multiple filesystems are not involved. If there is a file called \fI.noindex\fR in a directory, the contents of that directory and all of its subdirectories will be ignored. This can be useful to exclude certain directories from the indexing process, for example directories with spam-messages. If there is a file called \fI.noupdate\fR in a directory, the contents of that directory and all of its subdirectories will be ignored, unless we do a full rebuild (with \fBmu init\fR). This can be useful to speed up things you have some maildirs that never change. Note that you can still search for these messages, this only affects updating the database. There also the \fB--lazy-check\fR which can greatly speed up indexing; see below for details. The first run of \fBmu index\fR may take a few minutes if you have a lot of mail (tens of thousands of messages). Fortunately, such a full scan needs to be done only once; after that it suffices to index the changes, which goes much faster. See the 'Note on performance (i,ii,iii)' below for more information. The optional 'phase two' of the indexing-process is the removal of messages from the database for which there is no longer a corresponding file in the Maildir. If you do not want this, you can use \fB\-n\fR, \fB\-\-nocleanup\fR. When \fBmu index\fR catches one of the signals \fBSIGINT\fR, \fBSIGHUP\fR or \fBSIGTERM\fR (e.g., when you press Ctrl-C during the indexing process), it tries to shutdown gracefully; it tries to save and commit data, and close the database etc. If it receives another signal (e.g., when pressing Ctrl-C once more), \fBmu index\fR will terminate immediately. .SH OPTIONS Note, some of the general options are described in the \fBmu(1)\fR man-page and not here, as they apply to multiple mu commands. .TP \fB\-\-lazy-check\fR in lazy-check mode, \fBmu\fR does not consider messages for which the time-stamp (ctime) of the directory they reside in has not changed since the previous indexing run. This is much faster than the non-lazy check, but won't update messages that have change (rather than having been added or removed), since merely editing a message does not update the directory time-stamp. Of course, you can run \fBmu-index\fR occasionally without \fB\-\-lazy-check\fR, to pick up such messages. .TP \fB\-\-nocleanup\fR disables the database cleanup that \fBmu\fR does by default after indexing. .SS A note on performance (i) As a non-scientific benchmark, a simple test on the author's machine (a Thinkpad X61s laptop using Linux 2.6.35 and an ext3 file system) with no existing database, and a maildir with 27273 messages: .nf $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' $ time mu index --quiet 66,65s user 6,05s system 27% cpu 4:24,20 total .fi (about 103 messages per second) A second run, which is the more typical use case when there is a database already, goes much faster: .nf $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' $ time mu index --quiet 0,48s user 0,76s system 10% cpu 11,796 total .fi (more than 56818 messages per second) Note that each test flushes the caches first; a more common use case might be to run \fBmu index\fR when new mail has arrived; the cache may stay quite 'warm' in that case: .nf $ time mu index --quiet 0,33s user 0,40s system 80% cpu 0,905 total .fi which is more than 30000 messages per second. .SS A note on performance (ii) As per June 2012, we did the same non-scientific benchmark, this time with an Intel i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz, an ext4 file system and a maildir with 22589 messages. We start without an existing database. .nf $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' $ time mu index --quiet 27,79s user 2,17s system 48% cpu 1:01,47 total .fi (about 813 messages per second) A second run, which is the more typical use case when there is a database already, goes much faster: .nf $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' $ time mu index --quiet 0,13s user 0,30s system 19% cpu 2,162 total .fi (more than 173000 messages per second) .SS A note on performance (iii) As per July 2016, we did the same non-scientific benchmark, again with the Intel i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz, an ext4 file system. This time, the maildir contains 72525 messages. .nf $ sudo sh -c 'sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' $ time mu index --quiet 40,34s user 2,56s system 64% cpu 1:06,17 total .fi (about 1099 messages per second). As shown, \fBmu\fR has been getting faster with each release, even with relatively expensive new features such as text-normalization (for case-insensitve/accent-insensitive matching). The profiles are dominated by operations in the Xapian database now. .SH FILES \fBmu\fR stores logs of its operations and queries in \fI/mu.log\fR (by default, this is \fI~/.cache/mu/mu.log\fR). Upon startup, \fBmu\fR checks the size of this log file. If it exceeds 1 MB, it will be moved to \fI~/.cache/mu/mu.log.old\fR, overwriting any existing file of that name, and start with an empty log file. This scheme allows for continued use of \fBmu\fR without the need for any manual maintenance of log files. .SH ENVIRONMENT \fBmu index\fR uses \fBMAILDIR\fR to find the user's Maildir if it has not been specified explicitly with \fB\-\-maildir\fR=\fI\fR. If \fBMAILDIR\fR is not set, \fBmu index\fR will try \fI~/Maildir\fR. .SH RETURN VALUE \fBmu index\fR return 0 upon successful completion, and any other number greater than 0 signals an error. .SH BUGS Please report bugs if you find them: .BR https://github.com/djcb/mu/issues .SH AUTHOR Dirk-Jan C. Binnema .SH "SEE ALSO" .BR maildir (5), .BR mu (1), .BR mu-init (1), .BR mu-find (1), .BR mu-cfind (1)